Modern society demands a dynamic, innovative approach to teaching and learning—one that recognizes the limitations of traditional education models first designed 200 years ago to meet the needs of an industrial age (Sahlberg, 2011). At Crucible Business Academy, we draw on contemporary insights from educational neuroscience and evidence-based pedagogy, weaving research directly into every facet of our program. From the way our classrooms are arranged to the way our curriculum is structured, our emphasis remains on approaches shown to enhance student engagement, deepen understanding, and foster real-world skills (Darling-Hammond et al., 2020).

​

     We recognize that business—broadly encompassing entrepreneurship, innovation, and commerce—shapes every aspect of daily life, from the products we buy to the services we depend on (Neck & Corbett, 2018). Our curriculum prioritizes business literacy and entrepreneurial thinking not only to prepare students for economic opportunities but also to empower them to create solutions that matter in their communities. By combining theoretical instruction with practical simulations, mentorships, and real-world projects, we equip learners with the tools they need to navigate a complex, interconnected economy (Sánchez, 2013).

​

     Our aim is to foster well-rounded individuals who think critically, collaborate effectively, and adapt readily to new challenges. Research suggests that when schools nurture creativity, problem-solving, ethical leadership, and empathy—along with core academic competencies—students are better prepared to thrive in higher education, future careers, and personal endeavors (Robinson, 2011; Hattie, 2009). By integrating best practices from educational research into our day-to-day operations, Crucible Business Academy aspires to develop a new generation of leaders who are academically strong, innovative, compassionate, and ready to shape the future.

​

Education Goals:

 

1. To provide a challenging and engaging curriculum that prepares students for success in college and beyond.

2. To foster a learning environment that promotes creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving skills.

3. To cultivate a sense of personal responsibility, social awareness, and ethical behavior in our students.

4. To empower students to become leaders and changemakers in their communities and beyond.

5. To foster a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship that prepares students for success in a rapidly changing world.

​

Five Pillars of Our Approach:

1. Project-Based Learning (PBL)
   We place hands-on experiences and real-world problem-solving at the center of the student journey, in keeping with research that links project-based learning to higher-level reasoning, collaboration, and creative thinking (Bell, 2010; Condliffe et al., 2017). By working on extended, interdisciplinary projects, students not only master subject content but also develop the resilience and entrepreneurial mindset needed to adapt in a rapidly changing global landscape.

2. Democratic Schooling
   Genuine student voice is central to an engaged school community. Our commitment to democratic education means students take an active part in shaping their learning environment—making decisions about class projects, school policies, and daily routines (Apple & Beane, 2007). Studies show that when learners feel ownership of and responsibility for their education, motivation climbs, and the development of civic and leadership skills is enhanced (Mitra, 2018).

3. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)
   Fostering students’ emotional intelligence and interpersonal skills is critical for long-term academic, personal, and professional success. Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) involves developing self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making (CASEL, 2020). Research shows that well-implemented SEL programs positively affect student behavior, emotional well-being, and academic outcomes (Durlak et al., 2011). By weaving SEL principles throughout our curriculum and school culture, we help students build resilience, empathy, and a strong sense of community—qualities that will guide them in facing challenges both inside and outside the classroom.

4. Restorative Justice
   At Crucible Business Academy, we view discipline not as punishment but as an opportunity for growth and reconciliation. Restorative Justice (RJ) underscores accountability and empathy by bringing together those affected by conflict to engage in open dialogue, address harm, and find pathways to move forward (Boyes-Watson & Pranis, 2015). This approach has been linked to decreases in repeated misbehavior, strengthened community bonds, and the cultivation of essential interpersonal skills (Wachtel, 2016). By consistently applying RJ principles—such as structured “peace circles” and community-building discussions—we create a supportive atmosphere where students learn to resolve conflicts constructively, value others’ perspectives, and rebuild trust (Evans & Vaandering, 2016).

5. Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
   Guided by the UDL framework, we strive to make learning accessible and inclusive for every student, whether they are visual learners, kinesthetic learners, or have special education needs (Rose & Meyer, 2002). UDL research highlights the benefits of offering multiple ways of engagement, representation, and expression—practices that promote stronger learning outcomes across the board (Al-Azawei et al., 2016). By designing our lessons and assessments with flexibility in mind, we ensure each student has a meaningful opportunity to succeed.​​

​

Project-Based Learning

​ We use Project-Based Learning (PBL) to teach because it is proven to be the most effective way for students to learn. PBL enhances students' entrepreneurial mindset by making them central to the learning process and involving them in practical applications of their skills (Masdarini et al., 2024). PBL supports the development of critical soft skills such as problem-solving, collaboration, and effective communication (Ngereja et al., 2020). PBL shows substantial improvements in entrepreneurial skills, project management, and personal satisfaction with their learning experience (Rupavijetra et al., 2022). 

​

​Our students start a new business every year they attend school under the guidance of teachers, mentors, and local business owners. The process from start to finish is an authentic experience. Students sell the goods they produce and navigate the challenges of operating a small business. They must collaborate with classmates, handle customers, manage resources, and take turns as the "owner" of the business. These projects integrate lessons in a variety of fields including math, writing, and science. ​

​

Democratic Schooling

Democratic Schooling at Crucible Business Academy stems from the belief that students benefit most when they are entrusted with genuine agency over their educational experience. We strive to establish a culture where students, alongside teachers and staff, share in the governance of daily school life. This collaborative ethos starts with transparent decision-making processes: school-wide meetings, councils, and committees invite students to vote on proposals, discuss policy changes, and suggest improvements. By placing students in these leadership roles, we encourage them to recognize both their personal impact and collective responsibility for the community (Gutmann, 1999).

​

In the classroom, student voice remains a top priority. Learners co-develop their goals, projects, and assessments with teachers, weaving their interests into the academic content. This model, informed by educational theory, fosters deeper engagement and internal motivation (Levin, 2000). Indeed, research shows that when students actively shape the curriculum, they become more invested and develop a stronger sense of ownership over their work (Mitra, 2018).

​

Democratic Schooling not only cultivates academic excellence but also prepares students for participation in a rapidly changing global society (Banks, 2008). By deliberating on school policies, engaging in constructive debate, and collaborating on solutions, students hone crucial civic competencies—critical thinking, negotiation, and mutual respect among them. Ultimately, the entire school community thrives when learners see themselves as contributors who have the power to enact meaningful change.

Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)

We understand that academic success hinges not only on intellectual rigor, but also on students’ ability to manage emotions, collaborate with others, and make responsible choices. This recognition informs our commitment to Social-Emotional Learning (SEL)—a holistic approach that develops critical personal and interpersonal skills alongside traditional academics. By cultivating self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making, we prepare our students to excel both within and beyond the classroom (CASEL, 2023).

​

Research has consistently shown that students exposed to high-quality SEL programs demonstrate enhanced academic achievement, improved mental health, and stronger social relationships (Durlak et al., 2011; Taylor et al., 2017). In fact, studies suggest SEL training correlates with long-term success, including higher rates of stable employment and positive personal relationships well into adulthood (Jones, Greenberg, & Crowley, 2015). At Crucible Business Academy, these findings translate into a vibrant, supportive campus culture in which students are empowered to excel in multiple dimensions of their lives.

​

By intertwining SEL with our entrepreneurial curriculum, we are raising compassionate, ethically minded innovators. Students who learn to listen to others, regulate their own emotions, and think critically about the impact of their actions are better prepared to lead responsible enterprises. They will be equipped to manage teams effectively, negotiate ethically, and sustain a company culture that values both productivity and humanity (Neck & Corbett, 2018). In this way, we aim to produce not only skilled business professionals, but also empathetic problem-solvers committed to positively impacting their communities.

​

Ultimately, Crucible Business Academy views Social-Emotional Learning as a lifelong asset. By teaching students to approach challenges with self-awareness, empathy, and strong interpersonal skills, we lay the groundwork for fulfilling personal lives, healthy relationships, and ethical leadership—no matter what future path they choose. Our graduates leave with more than a strong business acumen; they carry forward the emotional resilience, collaborative spirit, and moral clarity necessary to succeed in a world that increasingly demands compassion and innovation in equal measure.

Restorative Justice

At Crucible Business Academy, we believe that discipline should not be about punishment but about learning, healing, and growth. This conviction underpins our commitment to Restorative Justice (RJ), an approach that fosters reconciliation and accountability within our school community. Rather than simply penalizing students for misbehavior, teachers and administrators work alongside students to uncover the underlying causes of conflicts, encouraging those involved to reflect on how their actions affect others.

​

In practice, this means holding structured conversations—commonly referred to as “peace circles” or “restorative circles”—where all parties share their perspectives under the guidance of a trained facilitator (Boyes-Watson & Pranis, 2015). The conversations emphasize empathy and honest dialogue, leading to agreements on how to repair any damage done. Once solutions are reached, staff members remain closely involved to ensure these agreements are honored and students can reintegrate harmoniously into the community (Evans & Lester, 2013).

Such a model promotes a compassionate, respectful atmosphere that nurtures emotional security for everyone. Studies have shown that schools implementing Restorative Justice experience fewer repeat offenses and a healthier overall climate, in part because RJ addresses the root causes of conflicts rather than merely treating the symptoms (Wachtel, 2016). Moreover, by openly confronting and resolving issues, students acquire valuable communication, conflict-resolution, and leadership skills—tools that will guide them long after they leave the classroom (Evans & Vaandering, 2016).

​

Universal Design for Learning

​Our teaching philosophy is grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) as an educational framework that aims to improve and optimize teaching and learning for all students based on scientific insights into how humans learn. UDL provides a blueprint for creating instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments that work for everyone by offering:

• Multiple Means of Engagement: Motivating students by providing various ways to engage with the content

• Multiple Means of Representation: Presenting information in multiple formats to cater to different learning styles

• Multiple Means of Action and Expression: Allowing students to demonstrate what they know in different ways

​

In a comprehensive study UDL was shown to enhance the educational outcomes for all students regardless of whether the student does or does not have a disability (Almeqdad et al., 2023). The reason behind this is that UDL uses more effective teaching practices (Almeqdad et al., 2023). We believe that every student has the opportunity to succeed and thrive. Our approach focuses on inclusivity, flexibility, continuous improvement, and science. Aligning UDL as our north star in our teaching philosophy ensures that all students have the opportunity to Forge their Future.​

​

“The goal of UDL is to use a variety of teaching methods to remove any barriers to learning and give all students equal opportunities to succeed.” (Morin, n.d.) Meyer et al., (2014) writes that Universal Design for Learning was coined by the Center for Applied Special Technology (CAST). CAST publishes trusted resources and comprehensive information on the subject. Traditional systems focused on fixing the student rather than fixing the curriculum. UDL uses neuroscience to craft flexible learning environments that can address many learners' needs (Meyer et al.). 

​

Meyer et al., (2014) indicates that traditional systems are built for the "average" student. However, not every student is average and will fit within this mold. Traditional systems discourage students when they don't fit, since they cannot access learning environments, curriculum, and instruction. UDL focuses on flexible learning environments and addresses these issues.

​

Traditional systems would focus on the disabilities or limitations of students but UDL targets the deficiencies of schools and proposes ways to support learning for all students through: multiple means of engagement, multiple means of representation, and multiple means of action and engagement (Meyer et al., 2014). UDL is supported by research and shown to transform classrooms into collaborative spaces where all students can learn. 

​

 UDL  is understood as a dynamic interaction between students and their environment. Flexibility in a curriculum allows all students including those with disabilities to experience a lesson and gain the most from it. Research shows that cognition and emotion are interdependent. In order to have effective learning we must have emotional engagement, and UDL integrates this crucial aspect of development into its principles (Meyer et al., 2014)

​

UDL is a transformative process which uses individualization to address the unique features among students. It aims to help all students become expert learners who: want to learn, know how to learn, and are able to achieve the high standards set for them (IRIS Center, n.d.). Crucible Business Academy is committed to this goal, recognizing traditional methods are not as effective. Personalization tailors the educational experience for all students with diverse needs while also maintaining high standards.

The IRIS Center (n.d.) explains the three guiding principles:

​

1. Multiple Means of Engagement: 

Students should have multiple ways to engage with a lesson to meet their unique needs. Options are required to maintain student interest in the lesson among a variety of learners. Options are also required to maintain consistent effort among all students throughout the lesson. Finally, options are needed to allow student control to self regulate the lesson. These options should allow every student to participate in the lesson with interest, effort and autonomy. 

​

1. Multiple Means of Representation: 

Students should be able to see the information in a lesson represented in multiple ways. Students have different ways that they can perceive, interpret, and understand information. Using different mediums and media allows students to see, hear, or experience the same information in a variety of ways. This enriches the lesson for all students, not just students with disabilities. 

 

1. Multiple Means of Action and Expression: 

Students should have multiple ways to take action like: managing their resources, setting appropriate goals, monitoring their progress, and making changes as needed. Teachers should assist this process when needed. Students should also have multiple ways of expressing themselves in a lesson from writing, drawing, speaking, singing, to physical actions. Some students may need to use assistive technology to express themselves. The objective is to let students express themselves and communicate their knowledge in a multiple of ways that enhances their learning.

References
 

• Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56.​

• Apple, M. W., & Beane, J. A. (Eds.). (2007). Democratic schools: Lessons in powerful education (2nd ed.). Heinemann.​

• Banks, J. A. (2008). Diversity, group identity, and citizenship education in a global age. Educational Researcher, 37(3), 129–139.​

• Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43.​

• Boyes-Watson, C., & Pranis, K. (2015). Circle forward: Building a restorative school community. Living Justice Press.​

• Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2020). Evidence-based SEL programs: CASEL criteria updates and rationale. Retrieved from https://casel.org/11_casel-program-criteria-rationale/?view=1​casel.org+4casel.org+4learningpolicyinstitute.org+4

• Condliffe, B., Quint, J., Visher, M. G., Bangser, M. R., Drohojowska, S., Saco, L., & Nelson, E. (2017). Project-based learning: A literature review. MDRC.​casel.org

• Darling-Hammond, L., & Cook-Harvey, C. (2018). Educating the whole child: Improving school climate to support student success. Learning Policy Institute.​casel.org

• Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students' social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x​pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+3casel.org+3pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov+3

• Evans, K., & Lester, J. N. (2013). Restorative justice in education: What we know so far. Middle School Journal, 44(5), 57–63.​

• Evans, K., & Vaandering, D. (2016). The little book of restorative justice in education: Fostering responsibility, healing, and hope in schools. Good Books.​

• Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.​

• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.​

• IRIS Center. (n.d.). Universal design for learning: Creating a learning environment that challenges and engages all students. Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/udl/​

• Jones, D. E., Greenberg, M., & Crowley, M. (2015). Early social-emotional functioning and public health: The relationship between kindergarten social competence and future wellness. American Journal of Public Health, 105(11), 2283–2290.​

• Levin, B. (2000). Putting students at the centre in education reform. Journal of Educational Change, 1(2), 155–172.​

• Masdarini, L., Suryani, N., & Sugiarti, Y. (2024). Enhancing students' entrepreneurial mindset through project-based learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(1), 45–52.​

• Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.​

• Mitra, D. L. (2018). Student voice in school reform: Building youth-adult partnerships that strengthen schools and empower youth. State University of New York Press.​

• Morin, A. (n.d.). Universal design for learning (UDL): What you need to know. Understood. Retrieved from https://www.understood.org/en/articles/universal-design-for-learning-what-you-need-to-know​

• Neck, H. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2018). Entrepreneurship: The practice and mindset. SAGE Publications.​

• Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., & Andersen, B. (2020). Project-based learning in engineering education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 400–414.​

• Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative (2nd ed.). Capstone Publishing.​

• Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.​

• Rupavijetra, P., Chulalongkorn, U., & Prapinwong, M. (2022). The impact of project-based learning on students' entrepreneurial skills and satisfaction. International Journal of Educational Research, 111, 101–112.​

• Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.​

• Sánchez, J. C. (2013). The impact of an entrepreneurship education program on entrepreneurial competencies and intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(3), 447–465.